<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We spend so much time smoothing things out&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/16/we-spend-so-much-time-smoothing-things-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/16/we-spend-so-much-time-smoothing-things-out/</link>
	<description>Linking Behaviour to the Bottom Line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Lewin</title>
		<link>http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/16/we-spend-so-much-time-smoothing-things-out/comment-page-1/#comment-91142</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Lewin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/?p=774#comment-91142</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon, good call on the lanuage and the Honda reference ;-) 

I&#039;m not completely convinced that language per se is the trick, although it clearly helps. 

There&#039;s a problem with its subjectivity (i.e. what really is ok, or what really is good, bad, excellent, etc?) 

There is also the idea that language is a direct extension of physiology which makes for some interesting implications!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon, good call on the lanuage and the Honda reference <img src='http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not completely convinced that language per se is the trick, although it clearly helps. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a problem with its subjectivity (i.e. what really is ok, or what really is good, bad, excellent, etc?) </p>
<p>There is also the idea that language is a direct extension of physiology which makes for some interesting implications!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Stapleton</title>
		<link>http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/16/we-spend-so-much-time-smoothing-things-out/comment-page-1/#comment-91140</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Stapleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/?p=774#comment-91140</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce - I like where you&#039;re going with this. Being OK for me is accepting the status quo and being comfortable with here-and-now. OAPs like okay. Worriers like okay. Dead people are okay.

Okay doesn&#039;t change anything. Why do we put so much effort into being okay?

If we spent more time thinking about &#039;What If?&#039; we might embrace change and the future better (I think it was a Honda commercial that first posed that question!)

I hope you don&#039;t mind me including this link to a recent post where I talk about negotiation for freelancers: if you get yourself into a un-comfort zone and not be okay, you have the upper hand.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.simonstapleton.com/wordpress/2009/04/06/freelancing-negotiation-psychological-tricks/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Freelancing Negotiation: Psychological Tricks&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce &#8211; I like where you&#8217;re going with this. Being OK for me is accepting the status quo and being comfortable with here-and-now. OAPs like okay. Worriers like okay. Dead people are okay.</p>
<p>Okay doesn&#8217;t change anything. Why do we put so much effort into being okay?</p>
<p>If we spent more time thinking about &#8216;What If?&#8217; we might embrace change and the future better (I think it was a Honda commercial that first posed that question!)</p>
<p>I hope you don&#8217;t mind me including this link to a recent post where I talk about negotiation for freelancers: if you get yourself into a un-comfort zone and not be okay, you have the upper hand.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simonstapleton.com/wordpress/2009/04/06/freelancing-negotiation-psychological-tricks/" rel="nofollow">Freelancing Negotiation: Psychological Tricks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
