<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When will the Artists take over from the Technicians?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/11/when-will-the-artists-take-over-from-the-technicians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/11/when-will-the-artists-take-over-from-the-technicians/</link>
	<description>Linking Behaviour to the Bottom Line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Lewin</title>
		<link>http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/11/when-will-the-artists-take-over-from-the-technicians/comment-page-1/#comment-91279</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Lewin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/?p=934#comment-91279</guid>
		<description>Hi Pascalis,

&gt;With all the arguments for and against, will HR ever become strategic business partner?

I think the key things that will put HR on the &#039;strategic&#039; map are the following;

* A scalable, objective technology or methodology that can be used on a widespread basis.

* The ability of the above to improve the economics of an organisation that uses it. Cheaper, more efficient, faster etc. etc.

* Given the implicit innovation, the above will change processes/people&#039;s roles to adjust to new ways of working.

* The approach will sufficiently valuable that some CEO&#039;s will take this &#039;strategy&#039; to their shareholders.

At the moment, I don&#039;t think there are too many candidates? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fourgroups.com/4g/4g_faq.html&quot; title=&quot;4G&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;4G&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_2.0&quot; title=&quot;Enterprise 2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Enterprise 2&lt;/a&gt;?

What about you, what do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pascalis,</p>
<p>&gt;With all the arguments for and against, will HR ever become strategic business partner?</p>
<p>I think the key things that will put HR on the &#8217;strategic&#8217; map are the following;</p>
<p>* A scalable, objective technology or methodology that can be used on a widespread basis.</p>
<p>* The ability of the above to improve the economics of an organisation that uses it. Cheaper, more efficient, faster etc. etc.</p>
<p>* Given the implicit innovation, the above will change processes/people&#8217;s roles to adjust to new ways of working.</p>
<p>* The approach will sufficiently valuable that some CEO&#8217;s will take this &#8217;strategy&#8217; to their shareholders.</p>
<p>At the moment, I don&#8217;t think there are too many candidates? <a href="http://www.fourgroups.com/4g/4g_faq.html" title="4G" rel="nofollow">4G</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_2.0" title="Enterprise 2" rel="nofollow">Enterprise 2</a>?</p>
<p>What about you, what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascalis Claudius Lotinggi</title>
		<link>http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/archives/11/when-will-the-artists-take-over-from-the-technicians/comment-page-1/#comment-91270</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascalis Claudius Lotinggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourgroups.com/blog/?p=934#comment-91270</guid>
		<description>Interesting information to think over at the dawn of the New Year. Whither HR?

Twenty years is a long time but perhaps not long enough for the majority to realize the important decisions on human resource waiting for the attention of corporate leaders.

CIPD&#039;s comment is good for HR. We need more like it. This is to counter the negative comments about HR. 

With all the arguments for and against, will HR ever become strategic business partner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting information to think over at the dawn of the New Year. Whither HR?</p>
<p>Twenty years is a long time but perhaps not long enough for the majority to realize the important decisions on human resource waiting for the attention of corporate leaders.</p>
<p>CIPD&#8217;s comment is good for HR. We need more like it. This is to counter the negative comments about HR. </p>
<p>With all the arguments for and against, will HR ever become strategic business partner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
